Help Stop Unlawful Lockdowns!
Play on the Maaask wearers Ego
December 27, 2020 at 7:47 pm
“The bigger the lie, the more it will be believed.” — Joseph Goebbels
This following information is to inform you that there is more than enough facts to prove that the COVID-19 pandemic is a hoax. The prominent reason for people not accepting this is that they can not believe that so many sources could be so wrong. But a full scale dress rehearsal for what we are experiencing actually occurred in Dartmouth Hospital in Lebanon, New Hampshire. An article in the NY Times on January 22, 2007 by Gina Kolata called “Faith in Quick Test leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t” tells a story of what was perceived as a Whooping cough outbreak. This appeared to be confirmed by the PCR test. After many months and many diagnoses, state epidemiologists sent 27 samples from people suspected of having Whooping cough to be cultured as a confirmatory test since whooping cough comes from a bacteria called Bordetella Pertussis. All samples came back negative. The PCR test gave False Positive results. It is my assertion that this is occurring now for the following reasons.
The PCR test was never meant for diagnosis and the kits say “Not for Diagnostic Purposes”. The reason for this is the PCR picks up a small genetic sequence and multiplies it many times through cycle thresholds. In theory, the PCR can actually multiply a single molecule. This means a single part of a dead (inactive) virus could end up a positive result. A single virus could also produce a false positive. A former infection could do the same. The point is the PCR test will produce a positive result regardless of the fact that no present or even past infection occurred. This is driving the so called pandemic. And the more cycles used the greater the chance of false positives. This scenario was addressed in a NY Times article on October 14, 2020 titled “Your Corona Test is Positive. Maybe it Shouldn’t Be”. In a November 20, 2020 article in the Portugal Resident by Natasha Donn, positive PCR tests were retested by cell cultures.
“It’s here the ruling cites a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists in this material” published by the Oxford Academic at the end of September.
“At a cycle threshold (ct) of 25, about 70% of samples remain positive in cell culture (i.e. were infected): in a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive; in a ct of 35, 3% of samples remained positive and in a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in the culture”.”
This is proof that this pandemic is driven by False Positives. And now researchers are noting this. In a paper by 22 researchers called ‘The Corman-Drosten Review Report’ submitted to the Eurosurveillance editorial board on November 27, 2020, these researchers requested a retraction of a paper by Corman and Drosten submitted in January of 2020. One these 22 researchers is a specialist in PCR testing. The Corman-Drosten paper is a protocol for the PCR test during the supposed pandemic which was subsequently used by the World Health Organization (WHO) and by many or most medical practitioners testing for COVID-19 infections. The review paper describes 10 flaws with the paper’s protocol. While some are minor, others indicate that the protocol is useless for diagnostic testing. The protocol does not use any controls, it has not been adequately tested and does not use a genetic sequence from COVID-19. It uses a genetic sequence from a previous Corona virus which may or may not be valid. It did not specify the number of amplification cycles which, as has been mentioned, is crucial for avoiding false positives.
Perhaps one of the most relevant articles on this subject was submitted to the John Hopkins News-Letter on November 22, 2020 by Dr. Genevieve Briand titled ‘A closer look at U.S. deaths due to Covid-19’. Using data from the CDC, she found that the overall death (all cause mortality) rate had not changed during the pandemic. This is more proof that the pandemic could not have occurred. She also graphed the overall deaths by age and percent. What was observed was no significant increase in the oldest group where we were told the virus was most prevalent. This led her to find that the increase in Covid deaths (which is currently grouped with Influenza and Pneumonia and known as PIC) was almost exactly equal to the decrease from deaths from all other causes. This is absurd and yet more proof of false positives. Her article was soon censored for the following reason: “this article may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about COVID-19”. Absolutely no errors or fraud on any level was stated.
If there is any error in the overall death rate, then at least one other country with a pandemic would show an increase in the overall death rate. According Reiner Fullmich, a lawyer who has started a class action lawsuit against nations that have lockdowns, no nation on Earth has experienced a significant over all death rate due to Covid-10. This means no pandemic.
The preceding information, censorship, face masks and the suppression of hydroxychloroquine and natural supplements indicate the triumph of politics over facts, reason and medical science. The only weapons we have are an open and inquisitive mind, the ability to question everything and the willingness to investigate. This paper is a call to do your own homework.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
© 2021 AntiLockDown.org
Theme by Anders Norén — Up ↑